You can pick up a copy here. This allows the canon to shape itself, and reshape itself, as an organic expression of the experience of a community.
One of the great advantages of having a canon is that it makes it a lot easier to filter out trash. All this presupposes, of course, a very different attitude toward the past, and the literary and other legacies of the past, than the zealots of left and right like to encourage these days.
These are valid questions. To teach someone how to think is to educate them in the workings of thought, so that they can then consider the questions that matter to them and come up with their own answers.
The second is to find a balance between works that come out of your own cultural background and works that come from elsewhere. Pay attention, though, to what inevitably happens thereafter. Philosophers from Plato to Sartre have aimed at the same goal, and a good many of them reached it. Some books have this as their primary objective.
The current bickering between the political correctness of the left and the patriotic correctness of the right is a familiar phenomenon in cultural history. Plenty of very old stories are thumping good reads; J. Other books achieve the same effect very nearly by accident. American education these days is obsessed with teaching students what to think, with forcing them to give the right answers.
You can find their novels in online archives of old books if you want, and I dare you to read them without either dozing off or spraying the beverage of your choice across your computer screen.
This kind of problem arises routinely whenever a society fulfills two criteria. Will it become part of the canon? A very large part of the cultural senility I mentioned earlier arises out of the simple fact that most Americans read only recent books, and thus cut themselves off from the thoughts that shaped their own history and culture.is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.
Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte - Throughout history the idea of the hero or heroine has changed, but some common attributes remain. The hero claims Bill Butler: “is an archetypal figure, a paradigm who bears the possibilities of life, courage, love – the indefinable’s which themselves define our human lives”.
Free fictional story papers, essays, and research papers.
Last week’s post on the spooky dimensions of reading—the one-on-one encounter, in the silent places of the mind, with another person’s thinking—sparked a lively discussion on the comments page, and no shortage of interesting questions.
One of the points that was brought up repeatedly, though, focused on one of the points that I didn’t address.Download