The main shortcoming that is said about this method is that when comparing countries, since there are such a limited number of them, all potential factors of explanation can never be kept altogether constant.
In two party systems like in US, legislations are easily passed without being shot down by small parties that might be in opposition. I feel as if the mix of autonomy and capacity in the United States is appropriate and well balanced.
The highest price in the comparative politics is the Karl Deutsch, which is awarded by the International Political Science Association. Such forms of coercion are common within the federal system.
The Substantive Law of the EU: In a basic sense, MSSD starts out with similar variables between subjects and tries to figure out why the outcome is different between the subjects.
However, the style was descriptive rather than analytical. The rise of devolution has definitely cut into the powers of the central government; however power does remain with central government which can dissolve devolved assemblies as it did with the Northern Ireland Assembly.
The main criticisms of traditional approaches including that of Institutional approach can be described as under: In times of national crisis, the federal system clearly demonstrates its distribution of powers. If people tried to live without them there would be mass chaos and disorder and very little or no protection from inside and outside threats.
Taxes would not get paid if there was no underlying force which aided in that process. It would not be possible to live without states because the protection, order, and security provided by states are needed.
They have looked at the way in which the functions of government are performed and relationships between rulers and ruled.
These studies thus are generally studies of foreign governments, or parallel descriptions of institutions or constitutions not exactly the comparative studies.
We can compare the institutions of a particular political system with each other at a given time. Institutional comparison involves a relatively 17 detailed description of the institution under analysis followed by an attempt to clarify which details are similar or different.
The federal government of the USA has increasingly used forms of blackmail and coercion to ensure that the state governments comply with federal ideas.
This implies that, comparative politics does not identify the scope or the subject matter in the study but emphasizes more on the method to be used to analyze the political phenomena.
The regulation of the single market has led to the smooth running of the businesses leading to the increase in Gross Domestic Product and job opportunities and hence the improved living standards. It has also been mentioned that during the course of its history the comparative method has gone through various developments and changes both in the scope of its areas of study as well as approaches and tools used.
Identical situations might not recur. There is no effort to evolve an analytical scheme within which an antecedent factor is related in terms other than chronological to a particular event or development.
The comparative politics involves implicitly or explicitly analysis applied in various nations and hence the use of common concept in comparing nations. Therefore inspite of its limitations it has not been complete discarded even now. There are several ways of comparing political institutions.Comparative Politics Essay The European Union was in the past known as the European community and is both an economic and a political party comprising of twenty seven member states - Comparative Politics Essay introduction.
It was formed after the treaty of Maastricht was signed in Essay about The Importance of Studying Comparative Politics - The Importance of Studying Comparative Politics Comparative politics is an important aspect of political science in that instead of studying how this country functions, it studies why other countries around the world are the way they are.
Oct 05, · Politics Essay - UK-USA Comparative «on: October 04,pm» “The USA is a federal state with governmental powers distributed between the states and the federal government. In comparative politics, the state is a series of institutions that maintains a monopoly of violence over a territory.
It relies on sovereignty—the ability to carry out actions in a territory independently—and power. Comparative politics is a branch or field of political science that involves empirical and statistical approaches which are based on comparative methods. In other words, comparative politics is a field of political science which involves study of political organization, domestic politics and countries’ conflicts.
- Comparative politics is an important aspect of political science in that instead of studying how this country functions, it studies why other countries around the world are the way they are. There must be some medium for finding the differences and similarities between one county and another.Download