Do Argue With a Theme Ideally, closing argument will expand on a case theme introduced in opening statement. A cohesive structure for your argument is the very foundation of what makes it compelling and easy for the Court to digest completely, with all of its nuances.
This should be the hardest part of drafting your argument, so do not be hard on yourself if it takes a little time.
Just list it all. In opening statements, parties are restricted to stating the evidence: The problem with this analysis is that juries have no idea how much money to award for certain damages such as pain and emotional suffering. If you highlight the important tidbits, you will be more likely to stop worrying about remembering them later.
Do not act like an ostrich with its head in the sand; identify and explain away problems for your case. Listen to the Case Carefully. Has he made promises that were not kept during the case? Instead, convince the jurors that the plaintiff is responsible for his or her own failures or those of the parties.
Employ a three-act structure. Pull quotes help the jury focus on the important language of the document and ignore what is not important. Plaintiffs want their jurors to be agreeable, so implore all members of the jury to consider the viewpoints of their fellow jurors, as the collective will of the panel is more important than individual beliefs.
Highlight Supporting Information For Future Reference There is no reason to artificially compartmentalize tasks as a trial advocate. If you represent the defendant, do not just argue that the plaintiff did not prove his or her case.
Cast yourself as a steward, not an advocate. The last board shows the traitor musketeer with the other two red musketeers smiling at each other with their swords held high. Highlight any testimony, and comments by the Court that support your theme in the case, as well as your perception of the Big Mistake made by the opposing client.
How does the evidence show that your argument is true? Pull out your highlighters, colleagues, as you are listening to opening statements and testimony so that you can easily refer to what you found compelling as you listen to the case. As a result of this shortsighted attitude, plaintiff was killed.
Ellis and Adam M. Later, the property manager testified that within the 12 months before my client applied for an apartment, there were numerous crimes on the property, including physical attacks, shootings, death threats and burglary.To write a closing argument, look back at your opening statement.
In a trial, an opening statement is a lawyer’s first chance to outline the facts of a case. Good opening statements are limited to just the introductory facts and should not attempt to sway the jury or audience with persuasive language.
Closing argument is supposed to be the climax of the case. It is your chance to be free from the rules that bound you during voir dire and the presentation of evidence. There are few rules that govern closing argument; accordingly, it should be fun to mi-centre.com: () Guide to Writing Closing Arguments Purpose: To persuade the jurors to adopt your view of the significance of the evidence and your view of the case.
Attorneys are free to argue the merits of their case: “As we know from Witness A’s compelling testimony, Event X occurred, which clearly establishes who should be held responsible in this case.”.
A brief summary of your argument may be useful, especially if your essay is long--more than ten pages or so. But shorter essays tend not to require a restatement of your main ideas. Avoid phrases like "in conclusion," "to conclude," "in summary," and "to sum up.".
Sep 03, · Expert Reviewed.
How to End an Essay. Three Parts: Brainstorming Your Conclusion Writing the Conclusion Avoiding Common Pitfalls Community Q&A The final paragraph of an essay is what ties the piece together into a single, cohesive whole.
Coming up with a good ending can be tricky, but understanding what elements it 70%(35).
I just found this amazing website with samples of closing arguments for prosecution and defense! (O.k. it’s one of my sites). The attorney goes through a fact pattern on an assault case involving a claim of self-defense, and also a burglary case involving potential mistaken identity and a coerced confession.Download